<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>alecs &#187; browser</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ylipsis.com/blog/tag/browser/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ylipsis.com/blog</link>
	<description>web development, SEO, technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 11:51:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New Chrome version</title>
		<link>http://www.ylipsis.com/blog/2010/01/new-chrome-version/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ylipsis.com/blog/2010/01/new-chrome-version/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 01:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alecs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ylipsis.com/blog/?p=349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I updated Chrome after reading on techcrunch about the new version. It&#8217;s great that you can sync your bookmarks now. Another nice thing is that an extension from Xmarks is available (last time I checked on the Xmarks site, they didn&#8217;t offer any integration with Chrome). However, no Firebug yet. And Firebug Lite doesn&#8217;t count! [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I updated Chrome after reading on <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2010/01/25/google-chrome-for-windows-extensions/" target="_blank">techcrunch</a> about the new version.</p>
<p><span id="more-349"></span>It&#8217;s great that you can sync your bookmarks now. Another nice thing is that an extension from Xmarks is available (last time I checked on the Xmarks site, they didn&#8217;t offer any integration with Chrome).</p>
<p>However, no Firebug yet. And Firebug Lite doesn&#8217;t count!</p>
<p>Firefox is like an old wife:</p>
<ul>
<li>you have lots of things in common with her</li>
<li>she doesn&#8217;t move too much and is very slow</li>
<li>she&#8217;s not exactly the prettiest one out there</li>
<li>she takes a lot of your memory</li>
<li>sometimes she breaks down (and cries)</li>
</ul>
<p>On the other hand, Chrome is like a young chick:</p>
<ul>
<li>looks sexy</li>
<li>she is very active and fast</li>
<li>she doesn&#8217;t have any experience</li>
</ul>
<p>I want to switch over to Chrome, but she is still too young :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ylipsis.com/blog/2010/01/new-chrome-version/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opera version checking</title>
		<link>http://www.ylipsis.com/blog/2009/05/opera-version-checking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ylipsis.com/blog/2009/05/opera-version-checking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 16:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alecs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opera]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ylipsis.com/blog/?p=261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seems that the new Opera release (version 10) is having problems with specifying its version. Some websites detected the first character in &#8220;10&#8243; and assumed it to be Opera version 1 (talk about dumb checks). So the solution was to keep the version at &#8220;9.8&#8243;. full story at sitepoint]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems that the new Opera release (version 10) is having problems with specifying its version. Some websites detected the first character in &#8220;10&#8243; and assumed it to be Opera version 1 (talk about dumb checks). So the solution was to keep the version at &#8220;9.8&#8243;.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2009/05/30/opera-10-user-agent/" target="_blank">full story at sitepoint</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ylipsis.com/blog/2009/05/opera-version-checking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some have a lot of free time on their hands</title>
		<link>http://www.ylipsis.com/blog/2009/04/some-have-a-lot-of-free-time-on-their-hands/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ylipsis.com/blog/2009/04/some-have-a-lot-of-free-time-on-their-hands/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 14:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alecs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3d]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prank]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ylipsis.com/blog/?p=246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230; some meaning Google. Along with the CADIE they also launched Chrome 3D. And this even works. Check the following screenshot:]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; some meaning Google.</p>
<p>Along with the <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=cadie+prank" target="_blank">CADIE </a>they also launched Chrome 3D. And this even works. Check the following screenshot:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ylipsis.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/chrome3d.png"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-247" title="chrome 3d" src="http://www.ylipsis.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/chrome3d-300x178.png" alt="chrome 3d" width="300" height="178" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ylipsis.com/blog/2009/04/some-have-a-lot-of-free-time-on-their-hands/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Xmarks problem</title>
		<link>http://www.ylipsis.com/blog/2009/03/xmarks-problem/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ylipsis.com/blog/2009/03/xmarks-problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 01:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alecs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[javascript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xmarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ylipsis.com/blog/?p=234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few days ago I had to update my FoxMarks addon to the new Xmarks. Today I couldn&#8217;t log in on Smashing Magazine forum (or any other website) thanks to foxmarks xmarks. Yes, a browser restart fixed the problem but come on&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.ylipsis.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/xmarks.gif"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-238" title="xmarks" src="http://www.ylipsis.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/xmarks-300x206.gif" alt="xmarks" width="300" height="206" /></a></p>
<p>A few days ago I had to update my FoxMarks addon to the new Xmarks.</p>
<p>Today I couldn&#8217;t log in on <a href="http://forum.smashingmagazine.com/" target="_blank">Smashing Magazine forum</a> (or any other website) thanks to <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">foxmarks</span> xmarks. Yes, a browser restart fixed the problem but come on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ylipsis.com/blog/2009/03/xmarks-problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Keep your bookmarks safe and synchronized</title>
		<link>http://www.ylipsis.com/blog/2009/02/keep-your-bookmarks-safe-and-synchronized/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ylipsis.com/blog/2009/02/keep-your-bookmarks-safe-and-synchronized/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 19:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alecs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ylipsis.com/blog/?p=204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Foxmarks is a FireFox addon that can keep your bookmarks (including the bookmarks toolbar) synchronized between different computers. It&#8217;s very simple to set up and it integrates seamlessly in the browser. It also offers to keep your saved passwords on their servers (encrypted), but I didn&#8217;t opt for that.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-205" title="foxmarks logo" src="http://www.ylipsis.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/icon-foxmarks1.png" alt="foxmarks logo" width="150" height="100" /><a href="http://www.foxmarks.com/" target="_blank">Foxmarks</a> is a FireFox addon that can keep your bookmarks (including the bookmarks toolbar) synchronized between different computers. It&#8217;s very simple to set up and it integrates seamlessly in the browser.</p>
<p>It also offers to keep your saved passwords on their servers (encrypted), but I didn&#8217;t opt for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ylipsis.com/blog/2009/02/keep-your-bookmarks-safe-and-synchronized/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chrome still not good enough</title>
		<link>http://www.ylipsis.com/blog/2009/02/chrome-still-not-good-enough/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ylipsis.com/blog/2009/02/chrome-still-not-good-enough/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 17:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alecs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ylipsis.com/blog/?p=162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Due to recent troubles with my laptop, I&#8217;ve turned to my desktop PC again and decided to try out Chrome since FireFox wasn&#8217;t installed. I got to the point where I was accustomed to the new browser interface quite well. Then the bad stuff began: some pages looked weird. Probably Webkit doesn&#8217;t read a particular [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Due to recent <a href="http://www.ylipsis.com/blog/2009/01/dell-xps-m1330/" target="_blank">troubles with my laptop</a>, I&#8217;ve turned to my desktop PC again and decided to try out Chrome since FireFox wasn&#8217;t installed. I got to the point where I was accustomed to the new browser interface quite well.</p>
<p>Then the bad stuff began:</p>
<ul>
<li>some pages looked weird. Probably Webkit doesn&#8217;t read a particular CSS correctly. But bothoth IE and FF do.</li>
<li>a minor bug with the refresh. It only happened on a particular page (<a href="http://www.loose.utt.ro/~oose/">http://www.loose.utt.ro/~oose/</a>). Basically you have to hit F5 2 times to reload the page. Tested on 2 <em>Chromes,</em> each on a separate machine.</li>
<li>pages loading slowly. Again, I only compared it with FireFox which didn&#8217;t had this problem.</li>
</ul>
<p>And it looks like <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/01/google-chrome-not-cool-enough-for-google-docs-facebook-if-youre-browsing-incognito/" target="_blank">surfing incognito doesn&#8217;t work</a> so well on Facebook or Googel docs!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ylipsis.com/blog/2009/02/chrome-still-not-good-enough/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chrome: promising but not yet viable</title>
		<link>http://www.ylipsis.com/blog/2008/09/chrome-promising-but-not-yet-viable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ylipsis.com/blog/2008/09/chrome-promising-but-not-yet-viable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 02:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alecs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ylipsis.com/blog/?p=67</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No doubt the biggest hype around the web these days is the launch of Google&#8217;s own web browser: Chrome. Introduced as a sleek and very fast web browser (in terms of rendering), it follows the simplistic lines of Google&#8217;s other products. There are only three toolbars: the tabs, address and bookmarks (yep, no title bar [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-68" title="google chrome logo" src="http://www.ylipsis.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/googlechromelogo.jpg" alt="" width="196" height="187" />No doubt the biggest hype around the web these days is the launch of Google&#8217;s own web browser: Chrome. Introduced as a sleek and very fast web browser (in terms of rendering), it follows the simplistic lines of Google&#8217;s other products. There are only three toolbars: the tabs, address and bookmarks (yep, no title bar :)).</p>
<p>Everything seems to work smoothly. Tabs can be dragged out of the main window to create a new one and back. The download manager is nicely integrated in a small bottom toolbar. Almost every toolbar that appears or disappears has a smooth motion tween.</p>
<p>A big difference from other current browsers is that each tab runs as a different process. Should one tab crash, it will not take all the rest with it.</p>
<p>There is good news for web designers. Chrome doesn&#8217;t have its own rendering engine; instead it uses <a href="http://webkit.org" target="_blank">Webkit</a> (also used by the Safari browser). So it is one less browser to worry about.</p>
<p>As for its usefulness, although it is a breath of fresh air, Chrome is still in Beta. Firefox still has a huge advantage given by the use of add-ons. I can&#8217;t imagine not having <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1843" target="_blank">Firebug</a> or the <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/60" target="_blank">Web developer toolbar</a> among other things at my fingertips.</p>
<div id="attachment_69" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://www.ylipsis.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/chromescreen1.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-69" title="chromescreen1" src="http://www.ylipsis.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/chromescreen1-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Google Chrome screenshot</p></div>
<p>Links</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/09/fresh-take-on-browser.html" target="_blank">the official Google blog entry</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.google.com/chrome/" target="_blank">download Google Chrome</a></li>
</ul>
<p>On a side note, I wonder how much traffic is sent to other &#8220;chrome&#8221; websites that have nothing to do with Google&#8217;s browser: <a href="http://www.chromebags.com" target="_blank">www.chromebags.com</a> (1st on Google for &#8220;chrome&#8221;), <a href="http://www.chrome.com" target="_blank">www.chrome.com</a>, etc. I would very much like the next Google product to be named Ylipsis :).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ylipsis.com/blog/2008/09/chrome-promising-but-not-yet-viable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
